Joined: Sat Dec 20 2003 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 2646
Nikita wrote ...
The better ones are after the camera started doing what I said.
In other words, after you read the manual??
Sorry - couldn't resist.
Of course I COULDA said - "Bad pics because its only a Nikon...." (I'm a Canon guy) - again - just kidd'n.
BUT - all in all, some nice shots in there. One thing tho - and I think everyone does this at the start - when you take a pic of a person/animal looking to one side - try to always have more space in front than the back - ie. don't centre the subject - let them have room to "walk" into. I'm not a pro by any means but I went nuts in the research a whlie back. Check out this link - a great resourse. Photography is great fun - keep it up.
Yeah it is a good camera but I have to have a lot of light or it complains about it being too dark.
Even when it's bright enough a lot of pics come out either blurred or the double image effect. I like it on 100 iso, higher than that and the noise starts getting in. Took it round some museums and it was a pain trying to get a good pic with or without the flash. That's why a lot of the pics I took look bad. All the times I've had to go back to the same places just to retake the same pics.